1923Turk :: Antwort schreiben

1923Turk
1923Turk

FAQ

Suchen

Mitgliederliste

Benutzergruppen

Registrieren

Profil

Einloggen, um private Nachrichten zu lesen

1923Turk Foren-Übersicht -> HaCked by NoD Of SaS Crew ::.

Antwort schreiben

Benutzername

Titel

Nachrichtentext

Smilies





Weitere Smilies ansehen

Schriftfarbe: Schriftgröße:

Tags schließen

[quote="Williambup"]?Sample essay 
The remainder of this essay creating tutorial is according to a short sample 'divorce essay' (about 1,000 words). 
To comprehensive all for the associated tasks, it is easiest if you decide to have the sample essay in front of you. 
A major change that has occurred with the Western family is surely an increased incidence in divorce. Whereas from the past, divorce was a relatively rare occurrence, in recent times it has become pretty commonplace. This change is borne out clearly in census figures. For example thirty years ago in Australia, only an individual marriage in ten ended in divorce; nowadays the figure is much more than a single in three (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996: p.45). A consequence of this change may be a substantial increase inside amount of solitary parent families along with the attendant problems that this brings (Kilmartin, 1997). 
An important issue for sociologists, and indeed for all of society, is why these changes in marital patterns have occurred. In such a essay I will seek to critically examine many different sociological explanations for that 'divorce phenomenon' and also consider the social policy implications that every single explanation carries with it. It will be argued that the most excellent explanations are to be found within just a broad socio-economic framework. 
One particular type of explanation for rising divorce has focused on changes in laws relating to marriage. For example, Bilton, Bonnett and Jones (1987) argue that increased rates of divorce do not necessarily indicate that families are now a whole lot more unstable. It is workable, they claim, that there has always been a degree of marital instability. They suggest that changes inside of the law have been significant, mainly because they have provided unhappily married couples with 'accessibility to some legal option to pre-existent marital problems' (p.301). Bilton et al. therefore believe that changes in divorce rates might be ultimate explained in terms of changes inside of the legal method. The problem with this type of explanation however, is it does not consider why these laws have changed during the number one spot. It could be argued that reforms to family law, in the process as being the increased rate of divorce that has accompanied them, are the product of even more fundamental changes in society. 
Another type of explanation is 1 that focuses precisely on these broad societal changes. For example, Nicky Hart (cited in Haralambos, 1995) argues that increases in divorce and marital breakdown are the result of economic changes that have affected the family. A person example of these changes is the raised material aspirations of families, which Hart suggests has put pressure on each spouses to become wage earners. Women as a result have been forced to become each homemakers and economic providers. According to Hart, the contradiction of these two roles has lead to conflict and this is the main cause of marital breakdown. It would appear that Hart's explanation cannot account for all cases of divorce - for example, marital breakdown is liable to occur in families where only the husband is working. Nevertheless, her solution, which is to relate changes in family relations to broader social forces, would appear to be significantly more probing than one particular that looks only at legislative change. 
The two explanations described earlier mentioned have very different implications for social policy, in particular in relation to how the problem of increasing marital instability may perhaps be dealt with. Bilton et al. (1995) offer a legal explanation and hence would see the solutions also being determined within this domain. If rises in divorce are thought to be the consequence of liberal divorce laws, the obvious way to stem this rise is to make them less obtainable. This solution, a person imagines, would lead to some reduction in divorce statistics; however, it cannot really be held up as a genuine answer to the problems of marital stress and breakdown in society. Indeed it would appear to be a alternative directed greater at symptoms than addressing fundamental causes. Furthermore, the practical knowledge of social workers, working while in the area of family welfare suggests that restricting a couple's entry to divorce would in some cases serve only to exacerbate current marital problems (Johnson, 1981). In those cases where violence is involved, the consequences could be tragic. Apart from all this, returning to extra restrictive divorce laws appears to be a choice minor favoured by Australians. (Harrison, 1990). 
Hart (cited in Haralambos, 1995), crafting from the Marxist-feminist position, traces marital conflict to changes from the capitalist economic program and their resultant effect to the roles of men and women. It is difficult to know however, how this kind of an analysis can be translated into practical social policies. This is as a result of the Hart program would appear to require from the earliest spot a radical restructuring with the economic plan. Whilst this may be desirable for some, it is simply not achievable inside the current political climate. Hart is right however, to suggest that substantially marital conflict will be linked in some way to the economic circumstances of families. This is borne out in most statistical surveys which present consistently that rates of divorce are higher among socially disadvantaged families (McDonald, 1993). This situation suggests then that social policies have to have to be geared to providing assist and security for these sorts of families. It is minimal cause for optimism however, that in recent years governments of all persuasions have proven an increasing reluctance to fund social welfare programs of this kind. 
It is difficult to offer a comprehensive explanation for your growing trend of marital breakdown; and it is even a little more difficult to find out solutions that may ameliorate the problems created by it. Clearly though, as I have argued within this essay, one of the most useful answers are to be found not in just a narrow legal framework, but in a broader socio-economic one particular. 
Finally, it is worth pointing out that, whilst we may appear to be living inside of a time of increased family instability, research suggests that historically, instability may have been the norm rather than the exception. As Bell and Zajdow (1997) point out, within the past, solitary parent and step families ended up significantly more standard than is assumed - although the disruptive influence then was not divorce, but the premature death of a particular or both of those parents. This situation suggests that in studying the cutting-edge family, one particular needs to employ a historical perspective, such as the possibility of browsing to the past in searching for ways of dealing with problems while in the current. 
References 
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1996). Divorces, Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Services. 
Bell, R. and G. Zajdow (1997) Family and household. In R. Jureidini, S. Kenny and M. Poole (eds). Sociology: Australian Connections. St Leonards. NSW: Allen and Unwin 
Bilton, T. K. Bonnett and P. Jones (1987). Introductory Sociology. 2nd edition. London: MacMillan. 
Haralambos, M. (1995). Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. 3rd edition. London: Bell and Hyman. 
Harrison, M. (1995). Grounds for divorce. Family Matters. No 42 pp 34-35. 
Johnson, V. (1981). The Last Resort: A Women's Refuge. Ringwood: Penguin. 
Kilmartin, C. (1997). Children divorce and one-parent families. Family Matters. No. 48. ( To choose from On-line ) 
McDonald, P. (1993). Family Trends and Structure in Australia. Australian Family Briefings No 3. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.[/quote]

Optionen
HTML ist aus
BBCode ist an
Smilies sind an

	BBCode in diesem Beitrag deaktivieren
	Smilies in diesem Beitrag deaktivieren

Alle Zeiten sind GMT + 1 Stunde

Thema-Überblick